Palin COVID-19 test delays defamation trial against NY Times | National News

New York (AP) — Unvaccinated Sarah Palin tested positive for COVID-19 on Monday, forcing her to postpone the proceedings in her defamation proceedings against the New York Times.

A positive test by the former Governor of Alaska was announced in court, just as the jury selection began in New York City’s federal court.

Palin claims that the Times have hurt her reputation Opinion piece written by the editorial board She falsely claimed that her political rhetoric helped instigate the shooting of then-Arizona US Congressman Gabby Gifors in 2011. The newspaper admitted that the first wording of the editorial was flawed, but it was not a deliberate or reckless way to make it generous.

Judge Jed Rakov of the US District Court said the trial could begin on February 3, if the 57-year-old Palin had recovered by then.

Palin, a former Republican Vice Presidential candidate, has previously been infected with COVID-19. She urged people not to be vaccinated and told an Arizona audience last month that “I would have to shoot on my corpse.”

“Of course, she hasn’t been vaccinated,” Rakov said when Palin first announced that he had a positive test at home.

An additional test in the morning was also positive, Palin’s lawyer told the court.

“She tested positive three times, so I’m going to assume she’s positive,” the judge said.

Rakoff said court rules would allow her to return to court on February 3, even if she was still positive, unless she had symptoms. He said she could see a doctor servicing the court on February 2 if she had symptoms.

The Peyrin proceedings are rarely required to survive the first dismissal canceled in 2019 and defend themselves in front of a jury in a defamation proceeding involving a major public figure by a major news agency. We have set the stage for various cases.

In civil cases, Palin is estimated to be a star witness. She seeks unspecified damages, saying the Times has hurt her up-and-coming career as a political critic.

Palin sued the Times in 2017, citing an editorial on gun control published after another Republican US lawmaker Steve Scalise was injured. A man with a history of anti-Republican activity Fired at the practice of a parliamentary baseball team in Washington.

In an editorial, the Times reported that Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of the constituency before Gifford was seriously injured in the 2011 shootings and the other six died. He wrote that he placed 19 Democrats under a stylized crosshair.

In a correction two days later, the Times said the editorial “wrongly stated that there was a link between political rhetoric and the 2011 shootings” and “wrongly described” the map.

The disputed wording was added to the editorial by James Bennett, then editorial page editor. At trial, jury trials determine whether they acted “actually malice,” which means they knew what they wrote was false, or “recklessly ignored” the truth. is needed.

In pretrial testimony, Bennett quoted deadline pressure because he explained that he did not personally investigate information about Palin’s political action committee before approving the publication of the editorial. He said he believed it was accurate when the editorial was published.

Copyright 2022 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.

Palin COVID-19 test delays defamation trial against NY Times | National News

Source link Palin COVID-19 test delays defamation trial against NY Times | National News

The post Palin COVID-19 test delays defamation trial against NY Times | National News appeared first on Illinois News Today.

No comments:

Post a Comment