London (AP) — The Duchess of Sussex won the latest stage of a privacy proceeding against a British newspaper on Thursday. Three senior judges ruled that the publisher infringed her privacy by duplicating a portion of a letter to her estranged father.
The Duchess, officially known as American actress Meghan Markle, said the Court of Appeals’ decision was a “right or wrong” victory.
The loss of plaintiff’s relevant newspaper said he was considering appealing to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
In February, the British High Court duplicated most of the handwritten letters that the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline website publishers sent to their father Thomas Markle after marrying Prince Harry in 2018. The article ruled that Megan’s privacy was illegally infringed.
The publisher has appealed and a hearing was held last month. Geoffrey Vos, a senior judge who dismissed the appeal, said Thursday, “The Duchess reasonably expected privacy in the content of the letter. The content is personal, private and legitimate. It wasn’t a matter of public interest. “
In a statement, 40-year-old Megan said the ruling was “a victory not only for me, but for those who were afraid to face the right thing.”
People are also reading …
“Most importantly, we have enough courage to condition people to be cruel and to reshape the tabloid industry that benefits from the lies and pain they create,” she said.
A lawyer in a related newspaper disputed Megan’s claim that she did not intend the letter to be seen by anyone but her father.
They wrote with the Duchess’ suspicion that her father had leaked a letter to a journalist in a communication between Megan and then-secretary Jason Nauf. Stated.
The publisher also issued the letter after Thomas Markle claimed to “brutally chill” his daughter before the royal wedding, following an interview with People magazine with five Megan friends. Claimed to be part of the right to reply.
But Vos said the article, which Sunday’s email described as “sensational,” was “rejected as a new public revelation,” rather than focusing on Thomas Markle’s reaction to negative media coverage of him. “.
In their appeal, the relevant newspaper also provided personal information by working with Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, authors of Finding Freedom, a sympathetic book about her and Harry. Claimed to be open to the public.
The Duchess lawyer had previously denied that she or Harry had worked with the author. However, Nauf said he provided the writer with information as evidence in court and discussed it with Harry and Megan.
Nauf’s evidence, previously undisclosed, was a dramatic twist in a long-running case.
In response, Megan apologized for misleading the court about the degree of cooperation with the author of the book.
The Duchess said that when she submitted evidence early in the case, she did not remember the discussion with Nauf and “did not want to mislead the defendant or the court at all.”
Meghan, a former star of the American television legal drama “Suit,” married Harry, the grandson of Queen Elizabeth II, at Windsor Castle in May 2018.
In early 2020, Megan and Harry announced that they would cease their royal obligations and move to North America, citing what they said was the intolerable invasion and racist attitude of the British media. They settled in Santa Barbara, California with their two young children.
In her statement Thursday, Megan said he had been “deceived, intimidated, and calculated attacks” for three years after the proceedings began. She treated the case as a “game without rules” and pulled the minutes as “a model that rewards confusion more than the truth to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers.” Blame the publisher.
In February, a judge in the High Court ruled summary judgment that Megan’s privacy and copyright were infringed without a complete trial. In the complaint, a related newspaper argued that the case should be brought to justice.
The publisher said in a statement Thursday, in particular, “Mr. Knauf’s evidence raises questions about the credibility of the Duchess.”
Mark Steven, a lawyer who specializes in media law and has nothing to do with the case, said he believes the publisher will appeal, although it is rare for the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom to file such a case. He said the publisher could also appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.
“There is a question of principle here: whether the proceeding should be terminated before the trial without testing the evidence and disclosing the proceedings,” Stevens said. He added that the ruling did not resolve the question as to whether the letter to Thomas Markle was “always intended to be published, leaked and used as a briefing material by Megan.”
A related newspaper said, “I have the right to this trial, and I think it only prolongs the pain of Megan Markle,” Stevens said.
Danica Kirka from London contributed to this report.
Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
British court upholds Megan in a privacy dispute with publishers | Work
Source link British court upholds Megan in a privacy dispute with publishers | Work
The post British court upholds Megan in a privacy dispute with publishers | Work appeared first on Illinois News Today.
No comments:
Post a Comment