New York (AP) — Former President Donald Trump’s lawyer appears in the Federal Court of Appeals on Friday, arguing that the U.S. government should assume the position of defendant in a defamation proceeding filed by the writer who accused him of rape. bottom.
A Republican lawyer told the judge that he was not trying to fend off personal liability in a proceeding by columnist E. Jean Carroll. He just wanted to prevent future presidents from being burdened by legal claims, they said.
“It’s not political. It’s not about becoming a Democrat or Republican, it’s just about protecting the presidency as an institution,” said lawyer Arina Haba.
Carol Sued Trump In 2019, he said he slandered her by denying her claim that she had raped her at a department store in New York City in the 1990s. In other statements, Mr. Trump said she was “completely lying” and “not my type.”
In the last few months of the Republican President, the Department of Justice Trying to replace him as a defendant In this case, he said he was acting within his office to respond to Carroll’s allegations. The Department of Justice has maintained its position during the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden.
Federal law makes it difficult for US government officials to individually sue for actions related to their work.
Changes are possible if the government wins to take the place of Trump It leads to the dismissal of the case. Federal courts have historically not allowed defamation claims against federal officials for actions taken in public positions.
Judiciary lawyer Mark Freeman told the Second U.S. Court of Appeals on Friday that he did not intend to “defend or justify” Trump’s comments by calling them “crude and offensive.” ..
“I’m here, the president facing this kind of public accusation, which the media is very interested in, is obliged to answer questions from the general public and answer questions from the media. Because I feel it, “Freeman said.
“When someone says he committed a heinous crime 20 years ago, he needs to deal with it,” Haba added. However, Carroll’s lawyer claims that Trump’s response is beyond his job.
“The White House’s job is not a promise of unlimited privilege to brutal someone who was a victim of a previous attack,” said lawyer Joshua Matz.
It is not clear how quickly the Court of Appeals will decide.
The Associated Press generally does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they choose to speak their story publicly, as Carroll did.
Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Courts Hear Discussion in Trump Rape Whistleblower Proceedings | National News
Source link Courts Hear Discussion in Trump Rape Whistleblower Proceedings | National News
The post Courts Hear Discussion in Trump Rape Whistleblower Proceedings | National News appeared first on Illinois News Today.
No comments:
Post a Comment